Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs SiteGround Optimizer
LiteSpeed Cache vs SiteGround Optimizer: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 86,129 for SiteGround Optimizer, about 6.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | SiteGround Optimizer |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 46,793 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 5,919 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 6,939 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 201 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 114 |
| .au in Australia | 12,134 | 3,377 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 1,955 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 376 |
98 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or SiteGround Optimizer?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 86,129 for SiteGround Optimizer, about 6.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and SiteGround Optimizer together?
98 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or SiteGround Optimizer as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.