Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Site Kit by Google
LiteSpeed Cache vs Site Kit by Google: who uses which
Site Kit by Google is on more sites: 2,080,530 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 3.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Site Kit by Google |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 985,288 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 78,394 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 76,817 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 61,447 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 67,130 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 46,629 |
| .it in Italy | 7,920 | 52,098 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 45,239 |
163,844 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Site Kit by Google?
Site Kit by Google is on more sites: 2,080,530 against 557,656 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 3.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Site Kit by Google together?
163,844 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Site Kit by Google as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.