Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Smash Balloon Social Feeds
LiteSpeed Cache vs Smash Balloon Social Feeds: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 504,854 for Smash Balloon Social Feeds, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Smash Balloon Social Feeds |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 226,649 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 17,907 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 21,421 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 27,242 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 9,396 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 16,095 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 7,037 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 11,690 |
13,229 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Smash Balloon Social Feeds?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 504,854 for Smash Balloon Social Feeds, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Smash Balloon Social Feeds together?
13,229 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Smash Balloon Social Feeds as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.