Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Strikingly
LiteSpeed Cache vs Strikingly: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 16,868 for Strikingly, about 33.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Strikingly |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 10,401 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 47 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 378 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 22 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 1,235 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 496 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 172 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 494 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Strikingly?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 16,868 for Strikingly, about 33.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Strikingly together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Strikingly as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.