Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs TablePress
LiteSpeed Cache vs TablePress: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 223,755 for TablePress, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | TablePress |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 75,142 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 22,769 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 13,795 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 6,660 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 4,284 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 2,060 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 5,803 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 5,983 |
2,372 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or TablePress?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 223,755 for TablePress, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and TablePress together?
2,372 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or TablePress as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.