Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs TYPO3
LiteSpeed Cache vs TYPO3: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 137,578 for TYPO3, about 4.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | TYPO3 |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 15,113 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 80,738 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 684 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 860 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 53 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 2,061 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 2,315 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 1,214 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or TYPO3?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 137,578 for TYPO3, about 4.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and TYPO3 together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or TYPO3 as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.