Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs W3 Total Cache
LiteSpeed Cache vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 1.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 25,856 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 14,367 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 9,005 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 8,404 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 5,103 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 10,500 |
| .it in Italy | 7,920 | 13,917 |
980 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or W3 Total Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 353,859 for W3 Total Cache, about 1.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and W3 Total Cache together?
980 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.