Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs Webflow
LiteSpeed Cache vs Webflow: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 262,115 for Webflow, about 2.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,306 | 128,353 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 8,089 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 10,992 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 1,938 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 1,532 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 12,539 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 4,457 |
| .au in Australia | 12,134 | 6,824 |
183 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or Webflow?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,659 against 262,115 for Webflow, about 2.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and Webflow together?
183 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or Webflow as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.