Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs WoodMart
LiteSpeed Cache vs WoodMart: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 107,332 for WoodMart, about 5.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | WoodMart |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 46,631 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 1,334 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 1,517 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 1,559 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 1,086 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 7,891 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 1,041 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 1,414 |
10,304 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or WoodMart?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 107,332 for WoodMart, about 5.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and WoodMart together?
10,304 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or WoodMart as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.