Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs WordPress
LiteSpeed Cache vs WordPress: who uses which
WordPress is on more sites: 13,259,893 against 557,659 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 23.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,306 | 5,629,241 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 963,420 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 565,595 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 396,384 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 377,501 |
| .it in Italy | 7,920 | 335,240 |
| .net on .net | 12,770 | 328,980 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 310,954 |
557,659 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or WordPress?
WordPress is on more sites: 13,259,893 against 557,659 for LiteSpeed Cache, about 23.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and WordPress together?
557,659 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or WordPress as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.