Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Fastest Cache
LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Fastest Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 103,916 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 39,619 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 13,724 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 7,433 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 6,855 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 4,273 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 8,230 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 6,568 |
554 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Fastest Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 299,890 for WP Fastest Cache, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and WP Fastest Cache together?
554 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or WP Fastest Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.