Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Super Cache
LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 103,355 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 14,864 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 21,667 |
| .uk in the UK | 20,858 | 5,997 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 4,844 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 2,745 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 6,885 |
843 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Super Cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 290,330 for WP Super Cache, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and WP Super Cache together?
843 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.