Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed Cache vs WPML
LiteSpeed Cache vs WPML: who uses which
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 410,983 for WPML, about 1.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed Cache | WPML |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 255,304 | 166,022 |
| .it in Italy | 7,920 | 28,847 |
| .de in Germany | 8,650 | 23,113 |
| .org on .org | 16,447 | 11,973 |
| .pl in Poland | 20,679 | 7,579 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 13,133 | 9,997 |
| .br in Brazil | 21,432 | 1,599 |
| .fr in France | 14,644 | 7,717 |
18,363 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed Cache or WPML?
LiteSpeed Cache is on more sites: 557,656 against 410,983 for WPML, about 1.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed Cache and WPML together?
18,363 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed Cache or WPML as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.