Home / Technologies / LiteSpeed vs Ruby on Rails
LiteSpeed vs Ruby on Rails: who uses which
Ruby on Rails is on more sites: 292,051 against 39,295 for LiteSpeed, about 7.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | LiteSpeed | Ruby on Rails |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,374 | 162,098 |
| .org on .org | 1,435 | 17,757 |
| .fr in France | 134 | 8,978 |
| .net on .net | 1,049 | 7,577 |
| .jp in Japan | 121 | 8,114 |
| .de in Germany | 203 | 6,498 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,006 | 4,569 |
| .ru on .ru | 95 | 4,623 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, LiteSpeed or Ruby on Rails?
Ruby on Rails is on more sites: 292,051 against 39,295 for LiteSpeed, about 7.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use LiteSpeed and Ruby on Rails together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using LiteSpeed or Ruby on Rails as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.