Home / Technologies / Lodash vs vanilla-lazyload
Lodash vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Lodash is on more sites: 2,805,745 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 62.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lodash | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,782,538 | 20,712 |
| .org on .org | 171,469 | 986 |
| .uk in the UK | 121,003 | 957 |
| .de in Germany | 70,116 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 67,910 | 954 |
| .au in Australia | 51,973 | 471 |
| .ca in Canada | 46,672 | 779 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 42,353 | 217 |
1,730 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lodash or vanilla-lazyload?
Lodash is on more sites: 2,805,745 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 62.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lodash and vanilla-lazyload together?
1,730 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lodash or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.