Home / Technologies / Lozad.js vs Socket.IO
Lozad.js vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 5.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lozad.js | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 31,864 | 4,748 |
| .jp in Japan | 4,075 | 39 |
| .net on .net | 2,174 | 558 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,142 | 285 |
| .org on .org | 1,044 | 376 |
| .br in Brazil | 426 | 740 |
| .kr in South Korea | 999 | 55 |
| .cn on .cn | 993 | 58 |
8 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lozad.js or Socket.IO?
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 11,013 for Socket.IO, about 5.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lozad.js and Socket.IO together?
8 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lozad.js or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.