Home / Technologies / Lozad.js vs Turbolinks
Lozad.js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 1.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lozad.js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 31,864 | 16,528 |
| .jp in Japan | 4,075 | 622 |
| .org on .org | 1,044 | 2,993 |
| .net on .net | 2,174 | 757 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,142 | 740 |
| .de in Germany | 648 | 816 |
| .uk in the UK | 692 | 444 |
| .cn on .cn | 993 | 83 |
30 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lozad.js or Turbolinks?
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 1.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lozad.js and Turbolinks together?
30 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lozad.js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.