Home / Technologies / Lozad.js vs web-vitals
Lozad.js vs web-vitals: who uses which
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 2.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lozad.js | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 31,864 | 6,745 |
| .br in Brazil | 426 | 7,224 |
| .ar in Argentina | 48 | 6,933 |
| .jp in Japan | 4,075 | 154 |
| .net on .net | 2,174 | 177 |
| .ru on .ru | 2,142 | 67 |
| .de in Germany | 648 | 593 |
| .org on .org | 1,044 | 115 |
5 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lozad.js or web-vitals?
Lozad.js is on more sites: 55,703 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 2.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lozad.js and web-vitals together?
5 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lozad.js or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.