Home / Technologies / Lunr vs vanilla-lazyload
Lunr vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 7,292 for Lunr, about 6.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Lunr | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,996 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 43 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 770 | 986 |
| .io on .io | 1,360 | 113 |
| .net on .net | 260 | 954 |
| .de in Germany | 198 | 885 |
| .uk in the UK | 82 | 957 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 50 | 841 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Lunr or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 7,292 for Lunr, about 6.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Lunr and vanilla-lazyload together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Lunr or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.