Home / Technologies / Masonry vs vanilla-lazyload
Masonry vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Masonry is on more sites: 818,749 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 18.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Masonry | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 347,259 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 58,458 | 885 |
| .org on .org | 39,846 | 986 |
| .fr in France | 28,010 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 23,770 | 504 |
| .net on .net | 19,593 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 19,134 | 957 |
| .pl in Poland | 19,364 | 456 |
2,491 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Masonry or vanilla-lazyload?
Masonry is on more sites: 818,749 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 18.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Masonry and vanilla-lazyload together?
2,491 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Masonry or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.