Home / Technologies / jQuery matchHeight vs Slick
jQuery matchHeight vs Slick: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 254,930 for jQuery matchHeight, about 7.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery matchHeight | Slick |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 99,552 | 795,050 |
| .jp in Japan | 20,519 | 94,724 |
| .de in Germany | 11,938 | 67,754 |
| .ru on .ru | 7,867 | 65,489 |
| .org on .org | 10,149 | 61,699 |
| .uk in the UK | 7,667 | 49,954 |
| .net on .net | 6,525 | 42,812 |
| .fr in France | 5,007 | 42,709 |
80,172 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery matchHeight or Slick?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 254,930 for jQuery matchHeight, about 7.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery matchHeight and Slick together?
80,172 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery matchHeight or Slick as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.