Home / Technologies / jQuery matchHeight vs Turbolinks
jQuery matchHeight vs Turbolinks: who uses which
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 7.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery matchHeight | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 99,552 | 16,528 |
| .jp in Japan | 20,519 | 622 |
| .org on .org | 10,149 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 11,938 | 816 |
| .ru on .ru | 7,867 | 740 |
| .it in Italy | 8,286 | 160 |
| .uk in the UK | 7,667 | 444 |
| .pl in Poland | 7,595 | 208 |
71 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery matchHeight or Turbolinks?
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 32,637 for Turbolinks, about 7.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery matchHeight and Turbolinks together?
71 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery matchHeight or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.