Home / Technologies / jQuery matchHeight vs vanilla-lazyload
jQuery matchHeight vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 5.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery matchHeight | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 99,552 | 20,712 |
| .jp in Japan | 20,519 | 212 |
| .de in Germany | 11,938 | 885 |
| .ru on .ru | 7,867 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 10,149 | 986 |
| .it in Italy | 8,286 | 504 |
| .uk in the UK | 7,667 | 957 |
| .pl in Poland | 7,595 | 456 |
850 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery matchHeight or vanilla-lazyload?
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 5.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery matchHeight and vanilla-lazyload together?
850 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery matchHeight or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.