Home / Technologies / jQuery matchHeight vs web-vitals
jQuery matchHeight vs web-vitals: who uses which
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 10.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | jQuery matchHeight | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 99,552 | 6,745 |
| .jp in Japan | 20,519 | 154 |
| .de in Germany | 11,938 | 593 |
| .org on .org | 10,149 | 115 |
| .br in Brazil | 2,538 | 7,224 |
| .it in Italy | 8,286 | 85 |
| .ru on .ru | 7,867 | 67 |
| .uk in the UK | 7,667 | 198 |
34 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, jQuery matchHeight or web-vitals?
jQuery matchHeight is on more sites: 254,930 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 10.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use jQuery matchHeight and web-vitals together?
34 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using jQuery matchHeight or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.