Home / Technologies / Material Components for the Web vs Pico CSS
Material Components for the Web vs Pico CSS: who uses which
Material Components for the Web is on more sites: 2,943 against 1,642 for Pico CSS, about 1.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Material Components for the Web | Pico CSS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,086 | 716 |
| .org on .org | 185 | 108 |
| .de in Germany | 165 | 95 |
| .fr in France | 153 | 36 |
| .pl in Poland | 121 | 14 |
| .net on .net | 50 | 76 |
| .edu on .edu | 92 | 2 |
| .uk in the UK | 58 | 30 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Material Components for the Web or Pico CSS?
Material Components for the Web is on more sites: 2,943 against 1,642 for Pico CSS, about 1.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Material Components for the Web and Pico CSS together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Material Components for the Web or Pico CSS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.