Home / Technologies / Material Components for the Web vs Pure.css
Material Components for the Web vs Pure.css: who uses which
Pure.css is on more sites: 14,396 against 2,943 for Material Components for the Web, about 4.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Material Components for the Web | Pure.css |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,086 | 5,373 |
| .de in Germany | 165 | 815 |
| .org on .org | 185 | 728 |
| .jp in Japan | 27 | 572 |
| .lt in Lithuania | 4 | 576 |
| .uk in the UK | 58 | 463 |
| .net on .net | 50 | 463 |
| .fr in France | 153 | 343 |
6 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Material Components for the Web or Pure.css?
Pure.css is on more sites: 14,396 against 2,943 for Material Components for the Web, about 4.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Material Components for the Web and Pure.css together?
6 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Material Components for the Web or Pure.css as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.