Home / Technologies / Material Components for the Web vs Tailwind CSS
Material Components for the Web vs Tailwind CSS: who uses which
Tailwind CSS is on more sites: 297,199 against 2,943 for Material Components for the Web, about 101.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Material Components for the Web | Tailwind CSS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,086 | 150,248 |
| .org on .org | 185 | 15,183 |
| .cn on .cn | 8 | 13,329 |
| .net on .net | 50 | 11,110 |
| .de in Germany | 165 | 6,426 |
| .io on .io | 31 | 5,510 |
| .uk in the UK | 58 | 4,820 |
| .pl in Poland | 121 | 4,138 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Material Components for the Web or Tailwind CSS?
Tailwind CSS is on more sites: 297,199 against 2,943 for Material Components for the Web, about 101.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Material Components for the Web and Tailwind CSS together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Material Components for the Web or Tailwind CSS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.