Home / Technologies / Materialize vs Pico CSS
Materialize vs Pico CSS: who uses which
Materialize is on more sites: 20,540 against 1,642 for Pico CSS, about 12.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Materialize | Pico CSS |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 8,290 | 716 |
| .org on .org | 1,218 | 108 |
| .de in Germany | 1,215 | 95 |
| .ru on .ru | 751 | 8 |
| .fr in France | 700 | 36 |
| .br in Brazil | 614 | 7 |
| .net on .net | 541 | 76 |
| .uk in the UK | 537 | 30 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Materialize or Pico CSS?
Materialize is on more sites: 20,540 against 1,642 for Pico CSS, about 12.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Materialize and Pico CSS together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Materialize or Pico CSS as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.