Home / Technologies / Materialize vs Pure.css
Materialize vs Pure.css: who uses which
Materialize is on more sites: 20,540 against 14,396 for Pure.css, about 1.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Materialize | Pure.css |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 8,290 | 5,373 |
| .de in Germany | 1,215 | 815 |
| .org on .org | 1,218 | 728 |
| .fr in France | 700 | 343 |
| .ru on .ru | 751 | 269 |
| .net on .net | 541 | 463 |
| .uk in the UK | 537 | 463 |
| .jp in Japan | 327 | 572 |
7 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Materialize or Pure.css?
Materialize is on more sites: 20,540 against 14,396 for Pure.css, about 1.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Materialize and Pure.css together?
7 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Materialize or Pure.css as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.