Home / Technologies / Meta Pixel vs StackAdapt
Meta Pixel vs StackAdapt: who uses which
Meta Pixel is on more sites: 1,578,816 against 4,451 for StackAdapt, about 354.7 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Meta Pixel | StackAdapt |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 747,650 | 2,973 |
| .br in Brazil | 52,941 | 1 |
| .org on .org | 41,289 | 499 |
| .au in Australia | 38,490 | 124 |
| .it in Italy | 37,705 | 3 |
| .uk in the UK | 36,640 | 122 |
| .pl in Poland | 34,551 | 1 |
| .de in Germany | 34,058 | 11 |
1,973 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Meta Pixel or StackAdapt?
Meta Pixel is on more sites: 1,578,816 against 4,451 for StackAdapt, about 354.7 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Meta Pixel and StackAdapt together?
1,973 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Join the waitlist to download every site using Meta Pixel or StackAdapt as a spreadsheet and hear when new ones appear.