Home / Technologies / MooTools vs vanilla-lazyload
MooTools vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
MooTools is on more sites: 155,041 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | MooTools | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 34,877 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 17,445 | 3,400 |
| .de in Germany | 19,756 | 885 |
| .it in Italy | 8,540 | 504 |
| .pl in Poland | 7,779 | 456 |
| .org on .org | 5,939 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 4,748 | 954 |
| .cz in Czechia | 3,941 | 451 |
10 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, MooTools or vanilla-lazyload?
MooTools is on more sites: 155,041 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 3.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use MooTools and vanilla-lazyload together?
10 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using MooTools or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.