Home / Technologies / Next.js vs vanilla-lazyload
Next.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
Next.js is on more sites: 921,157 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 20.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Next.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 423,937 | 20,712 |
| .io on .io | 32,809 | 113 |
| .org on .org | 29,816 | 986 |
| .ai on .ai | 26,277 | 48 |
| .de in Germany | 23,270 | 885 |
| .app on .app | 23,567 | 46 |
| .net on .net | 17,294 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 16,764 | 957 |
35 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Next.js or vanilla-lazyload?
Next.js is on more sites: 921,157 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 20.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Next.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
35 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Next.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.