Home / Technologies / Next.js vs web-vitals
Next.js vs web-vitals: who uses which
Next.js is on more sites: 921,157 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 36.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Next.js | web-vitals |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 423,937 | 6,745 |
| .io on .io | 32,809 | 14 |
| .org on .org | 29,816 | 115 |
| .ai on .ai | 26,277 | 13 |
| .de in Germany | 23,270 | 593 |
| .br in Brazil | 16,597 | 7,224 |
| .app on .app | 23,567 | 6 |
| .net on .net | 17,294 | 177 |
89 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Next.js or web-vitals?
Next.js is on more sites: 921,157 against 25,534 for web-vitals, about 36.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Next.js and web-vitals together?
89 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Next.js or web-vitals as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.