Home / Technologies / Ninja Forms vs W3 Total Cache
Ninja Forms vs W3 Total Cache: who uses which
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 44,709 for Ninja Forms, about 7.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Ninja Forms | W3 Total Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 20,637 | 137,143 |
| .de in Germany | 2,893 | 25,856 |
| .org on .org | 1,957 | 14,367 |
| .it in Italy | 930 | 13,917 |
| .fr in France | 1,679 | 10,500 |
| .dk in Denmark | 925 | 10,422 |
| .uk in the UK | 2,248 | 9,005 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 1,130 | 8,616 |
1,271 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Ninja Forms or W3 Total Cache?
W3 Total Cache is on more sites: 353,859 against 44,709 for Ninja Forms, about 7.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Ninja Forms and W3 Total Cache together?
1,271 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Ninja Forms or W3 Total Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.