Home / Technologies / NitroPack vs Sphinx
NitroPack vs Sphinx: who uses which
NitroPack is on more sites: 24,610 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | NitroPack | Sphinx |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 14,514 | 1,233 |
| .io on .io | 78 | 5,642 |
| .org on .org | 618 | 1,379 |
| .au in Australia | 1,320 | 4 |
| .de in Germany | 812 | 147 |
| .uk in the UK | 919 | 28 |
| .net on .net | 444 | 200 |
| .dk in Denmark | 617 | 12 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, NitroPack or Sphinx?
NitroPack is on more sites: 24,610 against 9,969 for Sphinx, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use NitroPack and Sphinx together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using NitroPack or Sphinx as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.