Home / Technologies / NProgress vs vanilla-lazyload
NProgress vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
NProgress is on more sites: 45,177 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | NProgress | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 19,868 | 20,712 |
| .kr in South Korea | 11,742 | 11 |
| .ru on .ru | 951 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 1,172 | 986 |
| .net on .net | 1,199 | 954 |
| .cn on .cn | 1,098 | 243 |
| .de in Germany | 435 | 885 |
| .uk in the UK | 198 | 957 |
32 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, NProgress or vanilla-lazyload?
NProgress is on more sites: 45,177 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 1.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use NProgress and vanilla-lazyload together?
32 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using NProgress or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.