Home / Technologies / particles.js vs Webpack
particles.js vs Webpack: who uses which
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 37.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | particles.js | Webpack |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 33,280 | 1,781,021 |
| .org on .org | 2,745 | 169,050 |
| .uk in the UK | 1,605 | 120,575 |
| .de in Germany | 3,460 | 66,965 |
| .net on .net | 1,556 | 66,266 |
| .au in Australia | 972 | 52,797 |
| .ca in Canada | 744 | 46,584 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 554 | 42,006 |
29 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, particles.js or Webpack?
Webpack is on more sites: 2,756,820 against 74,453 for particles.js, about 37.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use particles.js and Webpack together?
29 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using particles.js or Webpack as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.