Home / Technologies / PDF.js vs Slick
PDF.js vs Slick: who uses which
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 138.8 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PDF.js | Slick |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,907 | 795,050 |
| .jp in Japan | 217 | 94,724 |
| .de in Germany | 828 | 67,754 |
| .ru on .ru | 290 | 65,489 |
| .org on .org | 875 | 61,699 |
| .uk in the UK | 211 | 49,954 |
| .fr in France | 384 | 42,709 |
| .net on .net | 266 | 42,812 |
783 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PDF.js or Slick?
Slick is on more sites: 1,811,047 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 138.8 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PDF.js and Slick together?
783 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PDF.js or Slick as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.