Home / Technologies / PDF.js vs Turbolinks
PDF.js vs Turbolinks: who uses which
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 2.5 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PDF.js | Turbolinks |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,907 | 16,528 |
| .org on .org | 875 | 2,993 |
| .de in Germany | 828 | 816 |
| .ru on .ru | 290 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 266 | 757 |
| .jp in Japan | 217 | 622 |
| .fr in France | 384 | 352 |
| .io on .io | 116 | 604 |
24 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PDF.js or Turbolinks?
Turbolinks is on more sites: 32,637 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 2.5 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PDF.js and Turbolinks together?
24 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PDF.js or Turbolinks as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.