Home / Technologies / PDF.js vs vanilla-lazyload
PDF.js vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 3.4 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PDF.js | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 4,907 | 20,712 |
| .ru on .ru | 290 | 3,400 |
| .org on .org | 875 | 986 |
| .de in Germany | 828 | 885 |
| .net on .net | 266 | 954 |
| .uk in the UK | 211 | 957 |
| .fr in France | 384 | 740 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 142 | 841 |
5 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PDF.js or vanilla-lazyload?
vanilla-lazyload is on more sites: 44,884 against 13,048 for PDF.js, about 3.4 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PDF.js and vanilla-lazyload together?
5 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PDF.js or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.