Home / Technologies / HUMAN (PerimeterX) vs Sift
HUMAN (PerimeterX) vs Sift: who uses which
Sift is on more sites: 14,510 against 12,350 for HUMAN (PerimeterX), about 1.2 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | HUMAN (PerimeterX) | Sift |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9,475 | 12,618 |
| .org on .org | 618 | 333 |
| .sa on .sa | 0 | 454 |
| .co in Colombia | 322 | 77 |
| .net on .net | 125 | 114 |
| .io on .io | 195 | 42 |
| .ai on .ai | 189 | 8 |
| .uk in the UK | 114 | 61 |
1 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, HUMAN (PerimeterX) or Sift?
Sift is on more sites: 14,510 against 12,350 for HUMAN (PerimeterX), about 1.2 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use HUMAN (PerimeterX) and Sift together?
1 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using HUMAN (PerimeterX) or Sift as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.