Home / Technologies / HUMAN (PerimeterX) vs SiteLock
HUMAN (PerimeterX) vs SiteLock: who uses which
HUMAN (PerimeterX) is on more sites: 12,350 against 4,332 for SiteLock, about 2.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | HUMAN (PerimeterX) | SiteLock |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 9,475 | 2,163 |
| .org on .org | 618 | 194 |
| .de in Germany | 44 | 519 |
| .co in Colombia | 322 | 23 |
| .uk in the UK | 114 | 168 |
| .net on .net | 125 | 144 |
| .io on .io | 195 | 6 |
| .ai on .ai | 189 | 0 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, HUMAN (PerimeterX) or SiteLock?
HUMAN (PerimeterX) is on more sites: 12,350 against 4,332 for SiteLock, about 2.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use HUMAN (PerimeterX) and SiteLock together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using HUMAN (PerimeterX) or SiteLock as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.