Home / Technologies / PhotoSwipe vs vanilla-lazyload
PhotoSwipe vs vanilla-lazyload: who uses which
PhotoSwipe is on more sites: 719,565 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 16.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PhotoSwipe | vanilla-lazyload |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 319,341 | 20,712 |
| .de in Germany | 42,858 | 885 |
| .fr in France | 21,512 | 740 |
| .ru on .ru | 16,186 | 3,400 |
| .uk in the UK | 16,778 | 957 |
| .it in Italy | 17,196 | 504 |
| .jp in Japan | 15,932 | 212 |
| .pl in Poland | 15,404 | 456 |
1,270 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PhotoSwipe or vanilla-lazyload?
PhotoSwipe is on more sites: 719,565 against 44,884 for vanilla-lazyload, about 16.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PhotoSwipe and vanilla-lazyload together?
1,270 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PhotoSwipe or vanilla-lazyload as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.