Home / Technologies / Pimcore vs WP Super Cache
Pimcore vs WP Super Cache: who uses which
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 587 for Pimcore, about 494.6 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | Pimcore | WP Super Cache |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 192 | 103,355 |
| .de in Germany | 138 | 21,667 |
| .fr in France | 7 | 17,086 |
| .org on .org | 3 | 14,864 |
| .ch in Switzerland | 47 | 12,193 |
| .ru on .ru | 2 | 12,192 |
| .nl in the Netherlands | 9 | 6,885 |
| .net on .net | 4 | 6,694 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, Pimcore or WP Super Cache?
WP Super Cache is on more sites: 290,330 against 587 for Pimcore, about 494.6 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use Pimcore and WP Super Cache together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using Pimcore or WP Super Cache as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.