Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Polyfill.io
PixiJS vs Polyfill.io: who uses which
Polyfill.io is on more sites: 80,632 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 22.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Polyfill.io |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 43,820 |
| .io on .io | 28 | 6,418 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 3,239 |
| .pl in Poland | 65 | 1,851 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 1,490 |
| .uk in the UK | 51 | 1,494 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 1,295 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 1,199 |
11 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Polyfill.io?
Polyfill.io is on more sites: 80,632 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 22.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Polyfill.io together?
11 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Polyfill.io as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.