Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Preact
PixiJS vs Preact: who uses which
Preact is on more sites: 6,797 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 1.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Preact |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 4,083 |
| .io on .io | 28 | 344 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 168 |
| .ai on .ai | 8 | 260 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 86 |
| .co in Colombia | 30 | 141 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 23 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 91 |
13 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Preact?
Preact is on more sites: 6,797 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 1.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Preact together?
13 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Preact as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.