Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Quicklink
PixiJS vs Quicklink: who uses which
PixiJS is on more sites: 3,611 against 3,399 for Quicklink, about 1.1 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Quicklink |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 1,303 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 99 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 186 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 120 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 53 |
| .sa on .sa | 1 | 163 |
| .jp in Japan | 98 | 55 |
| .edu on .edu | 2 | 127 |
2 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Quicklink?
PixiJS is on more sites: 3,611 against 3,399 for Quicklink, about 1.1 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Quicklink together?
2 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Quicklink as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.