Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Redux
PixiJS vs Redux: who uses which
Redux is on more sites: 8,264 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 2.3 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Redux |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 7,704 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 481 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 4 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 2 |
| .jp in Japan | 98 | 1 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 6 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 1 |
| .pl in Poland | 65 | 0 |
0 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Redux?
Redux is on more sites: 8,264 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 2.3 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Redux together?
0 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Redux as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.