Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Socket.IO
PixiJS vs Socket.IO: who uses which
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 3.0 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Socket.IO |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 4,748 |
| .br in Brazil | 12 | 740 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 558 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 376 |
| .ru on .ru | 48 | 285 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 137 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 86 |
| .in in India | 18 | 176 |
107 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Socket.IO?
Socket.IO is on more sites: 11,013 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 3.0 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Socket.IO together?
107 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Socket.IO as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.