Home / Technologies / PixiJS vs Three.js
PixiJS vs Three.js: who uses which
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 6.9 times as many. Here's how they compare across the websites we've indexed, and where each one does best.
Where each one is used
| Domain | PixiJS | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| .com on .com | 1,736 | 11,782 |
| .de in Germany | 175 | 1,393 |
| .org on .org | 71 | 677 |
| .jp in Japan | 98 | 577 |
| .net on .net | 107 | 550 |
| .it in Italy | 147 | 498 |
| .fr in France | 73 | 490 |
| .ru on .ru | 48 | 483 |
50 sites run both at once.
Questions
Which is more popular, PixiJS or Three.js?
Three.js is on more sites: 25,096 against 3,611 for PixiJS, about 6.9 times as many, across the sites StackGrep has indexed.
Do sites use PixiJS and Three.js together?
50 sites load both. That's often a switch in progress, or two teams picking different tools.
Want the whole list?
Sign up to download every site using PixiJS or Three.js as a spreadsheet and see new ones as they appear. 200 free credits to start. No card needed.